Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 23 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 11:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

January 23, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Shmee 150's Ford GT at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz Actros L semi-trailer tractor at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Adidas store Frankfurt Zeil with Fit 711 gym atop --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Presentation of the Mercedes-AMG C 43 4MATIC at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: White climbing rope by Mammut Sports Group at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Battle of the Bulge Memorial Trail in Luxembourg --Cayambe 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Black swan (Cygnus atratus) cygnets --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Black swan (Cygnus atratus) --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Black swan (Cygnus atratus) with cygnets --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Black-fronted dotterel (Elseyornis melanops) --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) female, juvenile, male --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Crème caramel Moheen 09:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Picture not too sharp but acceptable, but please fix invalid categorization --Plozessor 10:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zorki 1 camera 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zorki 1 camera 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Krasnoarmeyskaya railway station --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Strezhen tugboat, Volga–Don Canal --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: T-34-76 produced by the Stalingrad Tractor Plant (STZ). --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sudoverf railway station --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sd.Kfz. 250/1. Volgograd Panorama Museum --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mansion, Avenue de Flandre 31, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 08:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Résidence Flandre, Avenue de Flandre, in Croix, France --Velvet 07:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Laurentius in Altenbanz --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altenbanz --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Altenbanz, aerial view. --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice view! I may be wrong, but it seems that many verticals on both sides are leaning a little bit to the left. Could you please try if rotating the image ca. 0.1–0.3 degrees clockwise improves the overall impression? Thank you! --Aristeas 11:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel in Hubenberg --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road bridge over the Nuremberg-Erfurt railway line between Püchitz and Altenbanz --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --SHB2000 09:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Building of the Teissere Malherbe library. --Touam 06:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: One of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence ready to march in Seattle's Fremont Solstice Parade --Jmabel 06:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ready to march in Seattle's Fremont Solstice Parade --Jmabel 05:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Might need a personality rights template. --Plozessor 05:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
    Template added accordingly. Jmabel 06:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train lamp with number 193, on Jiboia Locomotive, Catavento, São Paulo, Brazil. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cylindropuntia tunicata at Jardin de Cactus in 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Felino de Pé. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture! As usual, I'd appreciate a more specific filename ;) --Plozessor 05:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goat in an enclosure near Kraisdorf --Plozessor 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forest path south of the excavation lake east of Gädheim --Plozessor 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 17th century farmhouse in Donnersdorf --Plozessor 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In Mustion Linna park (Raasepori, Finland) --Plozessor 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iris pseudacorus in a small stream in "Struthwiese" protected landscape element --Plozessor 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in the center of Vnà, Pedval.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in the center of Vnà, Pedval Nr 165 (Detail).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in the center of Vnà, Pedval. Nr 165.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königstraße 11 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königstraße 18 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königstraße 50 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königstraße 55 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königstraße 57 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SBB Re 4/4 II Nr. 11153 passing Tägerwilen, canton of Thurgau --JoachimKohler-HB 05:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nes (Ameland): Rixt van Doniastraat 8 --JoachimKohler-HB 04:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bank with woodland on the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree in the parks on Weseler Straße (near Aaseemarkt) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The photo was taken as a multiple exposure, whereby several different shooting positions were selected around the object. --XRay 04:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building construction site of the apartment building Living Lake on Hauptstraße #76, #78, #80, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building construction site of the apartment building Living Lake on Hauptstraße #76, #78, #80, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alcove wayside shrine “Plague or Lippitz Cross” at Pension Wildente on Hauptstraße #135, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor house „Lieleg" on Hauptstraße #102, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Edelweiß on Hauptstraße #106, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glorias Navales Square. --Rjcastillo 03:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural en Santiago de Chile. --Rjcastillo 03:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural en Santiago de Chile. --Rjcastillo 03:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural en Santiago de Chile. --Rjcastillo 03:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. The mural shows Cuphead and Mugman from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuphead, should add that to the description. Probably could even use this image in the article. --Plozessor 05:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural en Santiago de Chile. --Rjcastillo 03:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right lion of Geirot mansion, Peterhof, Russia --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Same issue with the railing, plus lack of DOF, sorry. --Plozessor 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Left lion of Geirot mansion, Peterhof, Russia --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The head is good, but the body obscured by the railing. I would support an image of the head, of a different angle with less railing. --Tagooty 03:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tuman Aka complex in Shah-i-Zinda, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in Lovers Park, Astana, Kazakhstan --Bgag 00:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buildings in Astana near Nurjol Boulevard, Kazakhstan --Bgag 00:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shah-i-Zinda entrance portal, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of Khodja-Akhmad Mausoleum, Shah-i-Zinda, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Keoti Falls on the Mahana River, Madhya Pradesh, India --Tagooty 00:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loophole for firearms in outer wall, with 3 angles of view, Keoti Fort, Rewa District, Madhya Pradesh --Tagooty 00:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiger (m) (Panthera tigris tigris) drinking water, Mudumalai National Park, Tamilnadu --Tagooty 00:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose great catch but unfortunately not in focus --Charlesjsharp 10:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East wall up to north-east corner with flat plateau outside. Keoti Fort, Rewa district, Madhya Pradesh, India --Tagooty 00:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ornamental tiles in wall to left of the east entrance. Keoti Fort, Rewa district --Tagooty 00:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: George St, Sydney (by User:MDRX) --SHB2000 00:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noise in the shadows should be reduced, and needs slight perspective correction. --Plozessor 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

January 22, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Stone bramble (Rubus saxatilis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Fringed sandwort (Arenaria ciliata) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nettle-leaved bellflower (Campanula trachelium) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Standexpress - by tractor over the beaches of the island of Ameland, Friesland. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two women wearing rib knitted balaclavas - Variant 2 --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica on Fourvière hill in Lyon --Romainbehar 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abbey church of former Benedictine abbey in Lorch, Württemberg, Germany. —Aristeas 19:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Listed timber-framed house Lange Strasse 49 in Waiblingen, Germany. —Aristeas 19:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Listed timber-framed house Dorfstrasse 58 in Ochsenbach, Sachsenheim, Germany. —Aristeas 19:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nissan Townstar in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Nissan Qashqai e-Power in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt Hybrid in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mini Countryman (U25) in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination BMW 1er in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common buzzard (Buteo buteo) amazing hunter of mice and field pests, nicknamed the mouse catcher. By User:Olga Havlíčková --MIGORMCZ 18:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 22:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lintel of historical building (1624) in Saarburg (Germany), Laurentiusberg 39. --Palauenc05 18:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of historical building (1726) in Saarburg (Germany), Staden 15. --Palauenc05 18:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Triumph Herald 1200 --JoachimKohler-HB 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination "Kunklerhaus" in Gottlieben, canton of Thurgau. Probably built in 1681. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Limeni, Mani. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Saint Barbara near Erimos, Mani. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of the church of Agios Ioannis Avlonitsa, Naxos. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Top down view of the Jesuit Monastery of Kalamitsia, Naxos. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The tower of Palaiologos, Naxos. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Thawing puddle with leaves and other things in Freiham, Munich. Prominently visible is a advertisement from a nearby furniture store --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Playground in Freiham, Munich beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station - nest swing --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Playground in Freiham, Munich beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station - slide --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Balancing stick beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tower crane depot at Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in the newly developping quarter of Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Madonna in a Garland of Flowers - Peter Paul Rubens --GoldenArtists 17:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Inani Beach. Moheen 16:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Chittagong Liberty School and College. Moheen 16:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Water hole in Mole National Park --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Seagull resting on a bulbous bow of an empty freighter in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Demonstration of a foilboard at Interboot 2023 --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Twiliner reclining seat demonstrator at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rail yard Bischofsheim --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus fuliginosus) female with joey --Charlesjsharp 11:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australian coot (Fulica atra australis) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 11:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black kite (Milvus migrans affinis) --Charlesjsharp 11:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black kite (Milvus migrans affinis) --Charlesjsharp 11:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black swan (Cygnus atratus) --Charlesjsharp 11:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manual appliance for whipping cream and frothing milk --Berthold Werner 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Krasnoarmeyskiy Bridge, Krasnoarmeisky district, Volgograd --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Krasnoarmeyskaya railway station --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Strezhen tugboat, Volga–Don Canal --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Geroyev Stalingrada ave 38 house, Krasnoarmeisky district, Volgograd --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good light, impressive perspective. --Aristeas 19:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Taigei SS-513. --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kucharek Smak Natury spice --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zorki 1 camera 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zorki 1 camera 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zorki 1 camera 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zorki 1 camera 4 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daniel Leandro Gonzalez: Corretor de Café --Mike Peel 08:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benedito Calixto: A Epopeia dos Bandeirantes --Mike Peel 08:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Santos Improvements Company #40, tram in Santos, Brazil --Mike Peel 08:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Duck, Long Island --Mike Peel 08:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Duck, Long Island --Mike Peel 08:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chris Holmes at the premiere of the movie DEVO at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 07:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chris Smith at the premiere of the movie DEVO at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 07:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Private street, Avenue de la Marne, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 07:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Les Halles Modernes, Rue Franklin Roosevelt 77, in Mouvaux, France --Velvet 07:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station in Buttenheim --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Some might complain about the incomplete display due short exposure, but for me that's not an issue. --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station in Buttenheim --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station in Buttenheim --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Altenbanz in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    That has a strong blue tint ... --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
    That's how it is at blue hour. --Ermell 08:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road bridge between Püchitz and Altenbanz --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument "Stengelsee" near Dingolshausen --Plozessor 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of Trusetal waterfall --Plozessor 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture "Thuringian primeval forest trails" north of Eisenach --Plozessor 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forest path in "Southern slope of the Steinert near Jesserndorf" SAC --Plozessor 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small farmhouse in Gerach --Plozessor 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. View from the Steinsberg plateau of the surrounding mountains.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church tower of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of the mountains above Val Sinestra.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Seems like something went wrong with the processing here. Trees on the left side appear partly grey and partly intense green. --Plozessor 05:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
    * Done. Correction WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aloe Gerstneri at Jardin de Cactus 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bolsa Oficial do Café from Rua 15 de Novembro, Santos, Brazil. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Böckingsches Palais in Landau in der Pfalz, RP, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marktstraße 63 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marktstraße 14 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Marktstraße 29 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of the Rică Ionescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Picture is ok but should add a better description, this picture is not showing the "grave" ... --Plozessor 05:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Rică Ionescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bench by the wayside in the “Venner Moor” nature reserve near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Stephen’s Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Illuminated lower floor of the LVM 1 “Bürotower” high-rise building of the LVM insurance company in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naganeupseong Walled Town, Suncheon, South Korea --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nangmillu Pavilion in Naganeupseong Walled Town, Suncheon, South Korea --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East Gate of Naganeupseong Walled Town, Sucheon, South Korea --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jangseung in Naganeupseong Walled Town, Suncheon, South Korea --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jangdokdae with onggi in Naganeupseong Walled Town, Suncheon, South Korea --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vintage military fashion shop and a clerk waiting for customers. (The permission to publish.) --Laitche 03:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reshmi Jilapi. By User:Sohel Commons --আফতাবুজ্জামান 03:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Would be better if the dish wasn't cut off on the left side, but still ok IMO. Otherwise it is really good. --Plozessor 05:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MdsShakil 17:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Commercial and residential building Marienecke on Hauptstraße #185, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Commercial und residential building on Hauptstraße #177, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Commercial und residential building on Hauptstraße #177, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows at the commercial und residential building on Hauptstraße #177, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building on Khevenhüllerweg #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat with pilgrims rowing in to Quila Ghat, Triveni Sangam, Allahabad, UP, India --Tagooty 02:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus) mobbing a boat for food, Triveni Sangam, Allahabad, --Tagooty 02:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown-headed gull (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus) landing on the river, Triveni Sangam, Allahabad --Tagooty 02:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seagulls perched in the sun on a floating barrier, Triveni Sangam, Allahabad --Tagooty 02:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown-headed gull (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus) swimming on the river, Triveni Sangam --Tagooty 02:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rice and Hilsha fish fry. By User:Sohel Commons --আফতাবুজ্জামান 00:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, appetising! --Tagooty 02:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MdsShakil 17:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 21, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Emden, Schweckendiekplatz 1: headquarters of EVAG Emder Verkehrs und Automotiv GmbH --JoachimKohler-HB 23:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Emden-Constantia: Building (E) of the Emden/Leer University of Applied Sciences --JoachimKohler-HB 23:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Myah Overstreet at the premiere of the documentary short film To Be Invisible at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 23:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jazmin Renée Jones at the premiere of the movie Seeking Mavis Beacon at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 23:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guetty Felin at the premiere of the movie Seeking Mavis Beacon at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 23:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: An Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) running on ice in parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: An Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) running on ice in parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is noisy too. Should apply some more NR + sharpening. --Plozessor 05:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An European robin (Erithacus rubecula) in Gennevilliers, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 23:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An European robin (Erithacus rubecula) in Gennevilliers, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An European robin (Erithacus rubecula) in Gennevilliers, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination detail of a stained-glass windom in Ohio depticting St. Patrick --Nheyob 21:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination detail of a stained-glass window in Ohio depicting the Presentation of Christ --Nheyob 21:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination a cathedral in Michigan --Nheyob 21:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination perspective shot of a church sanctuary in Ohio --Nheyob 21:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: perspective photo inside a church in Ohio: --Nheyob 21:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Two women wearing rib knitted balaclavas - Variant 1. It is not perfect but good enough. Especially considering this is the first try at two portraits with blured background at once. --Tobias ToMar Maier 20:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Laufenburg (Switzerland) to Laufenburg (Germany) --JoachimKohler-HB 20:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The main square of Areopoli, Mani. --C messier 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petrobeis Mavromihalis house, Limeni, Mani. --C messier 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 20:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Saint Barbara near Erimos, Mani. --C messier 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 23:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the byzantine church of Agios Nikolaos in Sagkri, Naxos. --C messier 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Jesuit Monastery of Kalamitsia, Naxos. --C messier 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Case International 5130 Maxxum --JoachimKohler-HB 20:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slightly tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 05:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
    Uploaded an improved version. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Massey Ferguson MF 255 --JoachimKohler-HB 19:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief with putto playing violin, Hostinné, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 19:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timber-framed houses at the Melanchthonstrasse nos. 32, 34, 36 in Bretten, Germany. —Aristeas 18:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Schloss Urach over the river Erms in Bad Urach, Germany. —Aristeas 18:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Listed timber-framed building Schulstrasse no. 8 in Herrenberg, Germany. —Aristeas 18:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 189 064 of DB Cargo with a train No. 46601 of Arriva vlaky carrier with aluminium oxide from Rotterdam Botlek to Žiar nad Hronom; Zámrsk station, Czech Republic. By User:Cmelak770 --MIGORMCZ 17:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Transistor Radio Grundig Yacht Boy 215 --Berthold Werner 17:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Eltex Transistor Radio Model 707 --Berthold Werner 17:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Minicamera Agfamatic 2008 Pocket --Berthold Werner 17:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Agfa Box camera with leather case --Berthold Werner 17:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cabin of an Embraer Phenom 300 --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kverneland iXdrive self-propelled field sprayer at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panasonic Astrova IFE on display at Aircraft Interiors Expo 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Linz City Express trackles train in Linz --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 05:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neoplan Skyliner Diamond Edition at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panneau PK16+150 à Miribel (Ain), ligne ferroviaire Perrache-Genève (janvier 2024). --Benoît Prieur 16:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG SL 43 (R 232) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-AMG SL 43 (R 232) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz CLE 200 Coupé AMG Line (C 236) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz CLE 200 Coupé AMG Line (C 236) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Ford GT 40 - 1965 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 14:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 14:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 14:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 14:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capitolio, Toulouse, Francia, 2023-01-06 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 14:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Happy Human, icon used as a symbol of secular humanism (by Kontos). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Symbol of atheism (by Stannered). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The Sigil of Baphomet symbol (by GTRus). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inverted pentagram (by Andy5190, McSush|McSush). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terraces of Linderhof Palace in Bavaria, Germany. --Cayambe 13:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maserati GranTurismo Trofeo in Böblingen --Alexander-93 13:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz A 250 e in Böblingen --Alexander-93 13:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Vue des piliers de la Passerelle de Miribel en janvier 2024. --Benoît Prieur 13:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 22:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tram LM-99 in Saint Petersburg city in old green livery --Svetlov Artem 11:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Picture is ok but it has invalid categories. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bus LiAZ-6212 in Saint Petersburg city --Svetlov Artem 11:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Susanna and the Elders - Peter Paul Rubens --GoldenArtists 11:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This has a massive blue tint, compared to other photos of that painting. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
    Yes sorry,now? Thank you --GoldenArtists 17:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good now! --Plozessor 17:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) male --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) female with suckling pup --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus) --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus) --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination LV-0233 steam locomotive at the station "Taganrog-II" --Alexxx1979 10:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crimea. Feodosia. Art Gallery named after I.K. Aivazovsky --Alexxx1979 10:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Old terminal at Tenerife North Airport --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Canary Islands Chiffchaff feeding on nectar from a Pinninana planted under a Canary Islands Dragon Tree at Hijuela del Botanico, La Orotava, Tenerife. --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Boeing 777 aircraft engine above clouds over Brasil --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CPEF 193 “Jiboia” at Catavento, São Paulo --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dubs 2351 Locomotive at Catavento, São Paulo --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Peter Hrivňák performing in concert in Jihlava, Czech Republic. By User:Littleomig --MIGORMCZ 09:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs more noise reduction --Plozessor 10:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: This photo in this form won the Czech Wiki Photo 2022 competition in the famous personality category. For this reason, I will not edit the photo in any way. The expert jury had a different opinion on the quality of this photo. --MIGORMCZ 11:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Understandable, but QI guidelines read "images should not have distracting amount of noise when viewed in full size", thus IMO this cannot be QI. --Plozessor 11:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman base at Pasohlávky: Hradisko Hill, where a military fortress of the Roman army stood 2,000 years ago, photos from the Roman-Barbarian festival GERMANIA SUBACTA 2022, a Roman soldier during the reconstruction of the Roman-Barbarian battle. By User:Pavel21kriz --MIGORMCZ 09:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good picture, but needs more description. What is this, who is that depicting, what does the sign say, etc. --Plozessor 10:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: I have added the information I managed to find. --MIGORMCZ 11:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination morning above the fog. By User:Lukas.stas --MIGORMCZ 09:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes). By User:GabrielaZelenkova --MIGORMCZ 09:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mini Countryman (U25) John Cooper Works in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 09:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination BMW iX1 in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 09:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 218i Active Tourer in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 09:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned restaurant, Rue de Roubaix, in Mouvaux, France --Velvet 07:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lucie Aubrac schools, in Mouvaux, France --Velvet 07:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Henschel & Sohn plaque on the Jiboia Locomotive, Catavento, São Paulo, Brazil. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 07:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, filename should be better --Plozessor 08:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siproeta stelenes on a flower at Chester Zoo. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 07:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White rose at Hyde Park, London. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 07:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Echinocactus grusonii at Jardin de Cactus 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 07:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Samuel Blixen Claret. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 07:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Relief on an unidentified grave in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination St Laurentius in Altenbanz --Ermell 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church tower of Santa Maria Formosa in Venice --Ermell 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of the Catholic Church of the Holy Family in Breitenlesau --Ermell 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Wondering why some pipes seem noisy while others do not. Is this a stitch of multiple pictures? --Plozessor 06:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    No stitching but maybe some automatic masking by denoising Software. I'll try to fix that. --Ermell 08:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Check out the new version--Ermell 11:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good now! --Plozessor 11:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit in the Catholic Church of the Holy Family in Breitenlesau --Ermell 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Side altar in the Catholic Church of the Holy Family in Breitenlesau --Ermell 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trilobite Roundabout in Valongo, Portugal. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Avenue 5 de Outubro in Valongo, Portugal. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is almost ok, but slightly tilted clockwise. --Plozessor 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: I tilted it a little. What do you think? Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Church in São Martinho de Angueira, Portugal. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This needs at least perspective correction, like the other nominations. But it still is looks a bit overprocessed (massive NR plus sharpening) by the smartphone. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: City Hall in Villebon-sur-Yvette, France. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This needs perspective correction, like the other nominations. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main Building of the Myanmar Maritime University. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This needs perspective correction, like the other nominations. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marktstraße 52-54 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Equestrian statue of Luitpold of Bavaria in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altes Kaufhaus in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Langstraße 3 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marktstraße 89 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Quite noisy wall, but not really an issue as the window is good. --Plozessor 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Forest is a bit noisy but it's not the subject, so this is ok. --Plozessor 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow between Limbach excavation lake and Main river, in nature reserve --Plozessor 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument "Field oak near Ballingshausen" (the tree stands slightly crooked) --Plozessor 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument and geotope "Lug ins Land" ("peek into the land") near Fichtelberg --Plozessor 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please check for CAs. --XRay 07:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @XRay:  Done Thx, already removed some in the morning (were you looking at cached version?), but now removed some more and also resorted to a tighter crop. Please check again! --Plozessor 07:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. May be I've seen the former image. --XRay 10:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel between Ebelbach and Stettfeld --Plozessor 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1695 wayside shrine near Obertheres --Plozessor 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goransa Temple at Busosanseong Fortress, Buyeo, South Korea --Bgag 04:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Five-storied stone pagoda of Jeongnimsa Temple site, Buyeo, South Korea --Bgag 04:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Slightly tilted (see the buildings in background) --Plozessor 04:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Done --Bgag 15:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Jeongnimsa Temple, Buyeo, South Korea --Bgag 04:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    IMO very bright. --XRay 07:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Done --Bgag 15:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support IMO OK. --XRay 05:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient roman city of Pompeii, Italy --Poco a poco 04:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corso with the restaurant Da FranCo on Hauptstraße #193, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurasian spoonbill in breeding plumage, underside of bill visible --Tagooty 01:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

January 20, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: La Perla beach at January 2024 in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 21:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: La Perla beach in Mar del Plata, Argentina in January 2024 --Ezarate 21:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: APR alloy wheel at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 21:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you denoise and perspective correct (see vertical line on the left) please? --Mike Peel 21:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: EBACE 2023 at Palexpo, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 21:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The main square of Areopoli, Mani. --C messier 20:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A red tabby cat staring at the camera. --Roc0ast3r 19:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a better crop at the bottom due to the shadow, maybe a crop at the top and better denoising. --C messier 21:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done @C messier: Cropped and attempted to denoise. Let me know how that looks. --Roc0ast3r 23:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Monumento de los Derechos Humanos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 13:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This looks dark, not sure if it was taken at night (if so, should say so), but could it be brightened? Could you also check if PC could be improved? --Mike Peel 10:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Panteón, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 13:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 10:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 10:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) male --Charlesjsharp 09:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vehicle driving through the flood on the flooded connecting road from Lahm to Hemmendorf --Ermell 09:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Thawing puddle with leaves and other things in Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    I'd stretch the contrast a bit towards white. It uses less than 50 % of the brightness range and looks a bit dull. --Plozessor 04:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Office building at Clarita-Bernhard-Straße 9 in Freiham, Munich, constructed for Würth Elektronik eiSos GmbH & Co. KG as Hightech Innovation Center. Seen from Anton-Böck-Straße looking north. --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slightly tilted --Plozessor 04:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Construction work in the area of Anton-Böck-Straße and Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in Freiham, Munich. Detail of a building with scaffolding seen from a footpath parallel to Anton-Böck-Straße --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Construction work around what is going to be the Mahatma Gandhi Square north of Bodenseestraße in Freiham, Munich - windows waiting to be installed --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Water tower, Rue des Ecoles, in Mouvaux, France --Velvet 07:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small square between Stadthausstrasse 10 & 12 in Winterthur --JoachimKohler-HB 07:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cat sleeping at the concrete block at Volodarskogo street. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cat lying on a bench at the corner of Pogranichnaya street and Kurortny avenue. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cat lying on a bench at the corner of Pogranichnaya street and Kurortny avenue. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of Geirot wooden house, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Catalyst Science Discovery Centre --Mike Peel 01:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Manhansett (ship) seen from the deck of Fire Fighter (ship), Long Island --Mike Peel 01:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pavilion in Gongsanseong Fortress, Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 00:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed

January 19, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Egg Castle, Naples, Italy --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The verticals should be checked. --Ermell 09:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti in the underpass under S-Bahnhof Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Not something I would like to see anywhere in real life, but good quality anyway. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Footpath parallel to Hans-Stützle-Straße and stairs south of S-Bahnhof Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tower crane depot at Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in the newly developping quarter of Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Soviet locomotive Л 2180 at the turntable. Ruskeala park, Sortavalsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 16:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Need perspective correction. --Mike1979 Russia 07:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Paddy fields captured near Pulla village --IM3847 16:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A church in Georgia, USA --Nheyob 15:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the D.H.A. Solacolu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the D.H.A. Solacolu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tree spurge (Euphorbia dendroides) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Banded lapwing (Vanellus tricolor) --Charlesjsharp 09:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This seems extremely overprocessed somehow (in high resolution it looks strange). --Plozessor 16:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Siproeta stelenes on an orange at Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Siproeta stelenes on a plant at Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Phoenicopterus ruber in Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Stone (probably old wayside shrine head) with Holy Family in Augsfeld chapel --Plozessor 05:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit tilted to the left, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Famberhorst: Thx! Actually I think that the picture is straight (unless you're looking at the old cached version), but the stone is crooked. --Plozessor 17:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
    It's only a little. I added a note.Otherwise, just leave it be.--Famberhorst 08:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pond at the "Weihersbrunnen" ("pond fountain") in Dürrfeld --Plozessor 05:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Church tower of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed

January 18, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Popova Šapka Mosque, North Macedonia. --Kallerna 19:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Västra hamnen, Malmö. --Kallerna 19:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The church of the Taxiarches in Areopoli, Mani. --C messier 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Construction work around what is going to be the Mahatma Gandhi Square north of Bodenseestraße in Freiham, Munich - windows waiting to be installed --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Spilled oil in a parking lot in Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Graffiti in the underpass under S-Bahnhof Freham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Graffiti in the underpass under S-Bahnhof Freham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Footpath parallel to Hans-Stützle-Straße and stairs south of S-Bahnhof Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: FL6 train passing through Labico railway station on the Roma-Cassino-Napoli railway line. By User:Manny Mannheimer --Remontees 18:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good but slightly tilted. --Plozessor 19:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palast Abazy Odessa --Hwyrd 16:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: El Castellet, Orba, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Oral-B Pro 3 3000 toothbrush 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: European yellow-rattle (Rhinanthus alectorolophus) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Place Massenet street in the middle forming the boundary. --Touam 07:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

January 17, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Church of St Martin, Trujillo, Cáceres, Spain --Poco a poco 20:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    One dust spot should be removed. --Ermell 22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 19:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think this should be verticalized; it's too straight to go as a perspective picture. --Plozessor 19:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rock in paddy Field In Bali --Eka343 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Paddy Field and Mount Batukaru in Bali--Eka343 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Balinese Farmer Hat--Eka343 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rice Terrace in jatiluwih Bali--Eka343 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A church in Michigan --Nheyob 13:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Journal of Society of Chemical Industry volumes, Catalyst --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    books cropped on both images --Charlesjsharp 10:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Journal of Society of Chemical Industry volumes, Catalyst --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Blue plaque to ICI General Chemicals Widnes Research Laboratory --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cast iron vessel used to produce caustic soda, at Catalyst --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bridge on Zückshuter Straße over the Nuremberg Erfurt dual carriageway in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 09:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Renault Austral at IAA Open Space 2023 --MB-one 08:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you perspective correct, and ideally also sharpen and denoise, please? --Mike Peel 21:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Van Hool ExquiCity 24 Trolley of Linz Linien at Herrenstraße, Linz --MB-one 08:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Private street, Rue Albert Bailly 418 bis, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 07:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Stanley John ("Bertie") Reed, sailor. Bust by Cape Town sculptor Charl Frank at the V&A Waterfront. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Skate-class submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: USS Seawolf (SSN-575) submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dirt road in Rubim - Brasil --Túllio F 01:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction, otherwise good --Plozessor 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Presa del Embalse de Santa Ana --Túllio F 01:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slightly tilted. Otherwise acceptable (given that it's from 2013). --Plozessor 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

January 16, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: hydrobiologist collecting zoobenthos (by Panek) --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Portrait of Epicurus, British Museum (by Jastrow) --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you denoise, and fix the CA top-left? --Mike Peel 21:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
    I forgot to mention that the image is by another Wikimedian. The image is from 2011, so it seems that the best solution is to wait for new, better image. Thank you for the review. --Thi 11:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: One of the common symbols of atheism, created in 2007 (by Marekich) --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Atomic whirl, used as a symbol of atheism from the 1960s (by J.delanoy) --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt (2023) in Leinfelden-Echterdingen --Alexander-93 16:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review A too tight crop for my taste. Do you have a broader version? --PantheraLeo1359531 17:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for the review. I checked it up, there would be too many distracting elements in the foreground.--Alexander-93 08:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Another aerial view of parc de Merl in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: T-34-85 tank at the Mother Armenia Museum. Yerevan, Armenia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Moscow's Red Square on holiday. Moscow, Russia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pavé Stratégique roundabout, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 10:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Barilla Professional booth at WTCE 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Málaga Cathedral, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Convent of Santa Clara, Trujillo, Cáceres, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Sibirana, Uncastillo, Zaragoza, Spai --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Artichoke at Dunham Massey Hall gardens --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Banco Sonoro Jorge Wilheim --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quality is fine but it looks tilted in cw direction. It probably needs a tilt and perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Children's author Peter Lerangis - Jmabel 06:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you denoise? There are also two green bad pixels on the right that need to be fixed. --Mike Peel 21:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
    Took a shot at this, please have another look. - Jmabel 06:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: New York Transit Museum annex in Grand Central Terminal. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Traditional Iftar in Old Dhaka. --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please mention the creator in nomination (this is from Shariful Islam (Masum). --Plozessor 05:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Construction of Padma Bridge (2019). By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Barrel distortion and vigneting need to be fixed. --C messier 20:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ak-Buura River in Osh, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs tilt/perspective correction and it is IMHO a bit too bright/overexposed. --C messier 20:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 15, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: View of City Bowl, Cape Town seen from Table Mountain --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good quality, but can you try dehazing/correcting the blue at the top/most distant part of the image? --Mike Peel 10:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done tried to improve. Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La pointe de Tsevalire et les becs de Bosson vus depuis la corne de Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support In full resolution there are some spots which aren't as sharp as others, but given the large resolution IMHO it is good enough for QI. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Not too sharp but ok at 3 MP. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not really beautiful with all four sides crooked. Should skew it so that either the verticals or the horizontals are aligned. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    What exactly is that? (That should be in the description.) --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite blurry unfortunately. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vegetable seller's boat at dei Vetrai in Murano --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Litoměřice --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite prominent red and green CAs and needs perspective correction. --C messier 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    There are still quite prominent CAs (see the chapel at the left). --C messier 21:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Kraľova hoľa from Červená skala, Trsteník --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs slight perspective correction, otherwise would be ok. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Veľká lúka ("The Great Meadow"), Muránska planina --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lasar Segall: Emigrantes --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Check tilt/perspective, also I would crop a bit to the left for a more balanced composition. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Daisy Nasser: Nascer --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO, a bit underexposed. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daisy Nasser: Nascer --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information board at "Reed sandstone quarry northeast of Zeil am Main" geotope --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Artichoke at Dunham Massey Hall gardens. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Would it make sense to crop this tighter around the in-focus area? --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tomb guardian (also called jinmyoso or seoksu) found in the tomb of King Muryiong, Gongju National Museum, South Korea. --Bgag 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Borderline quality due to smartphone, but given the poor light conditions and the perfect composition, I think it is acceptable. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose garden and palm house of Mainau Island, Lake Constance. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately the roses are out of focus --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

January 14, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Beach in Stegna. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 21:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 12, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Railway switch in Zubrnice station --Draceane 13:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    lens + CA corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave on the Zell cemetery --Kritzolina 11:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could be a bit brighter and sharper. --Plozessor 19:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tugboat ZP Bison pulling Con-Ro carrier Atlantic Sun in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please check tilt/perspective. --C messier 21:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Alcazaba, Málaga, Spain. By User:Poco a poco --XRay 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This has significant CA on the left side of the window, otherwise would be good. --Plozessor 05:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version I've reduced it a bit, not so easy --Poco a poco 12:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry, the CA removal itself might be ok, but now there are some weird-looking spots in the window, see the note I added. --Plozessor 08:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version (please, decide now whether it's good enough or not, I cannot improve it substantially) --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    The CA could be acceptable now, but there are still some sharp white lines below and left from that person, looks like sharpening artifacts or something. See https://ibb.co/ZLBv2fV and https://ibb.co/LYXqTpm. --Plozessor 05:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

January 11, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Graffiti Alley, Toronto --Another Believer 05:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs PC and better filename --Plozessor 19:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tsilivakos tower, Flomochori, Mani. --C messier 21:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you please remove the piece of building/tower at the left border? --Poco a poco 21:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Done --C messier 10:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rail tracks at Bahnhof Ebenhausen-Schäftlarn - looking along the tracks towards Icking --Kritzolina 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Would be ok but is tilted and way too dark --Plozessor 19:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

January 10, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: BMW Kidney grille on a BMW 2 Series Active Tourer --MB-one 19:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think photo needs a little bit more space from the sides. --Kurmanbek 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done new crop --MB-one 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pěčnov, view of Libín --Draceane 19:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    new version uploaded --Draceane 16:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 14:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1962 Ford Thunderbird - white rear-left --多多123 17:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some CAs and based on the building in the background, tilted clockwise. --C messier 16:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Awards of the Volgograd Shipyard --Mike1979 Russia 06:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quality is OK, but some more categories and info about the awards would be welcomed. --C messier 16:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
    Categories and description added. --Mike1979 Russia 10:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 9, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Geological mapping in Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository. --Kallerna 19:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO the unsharp corners can be cropped and can you recover the highlights at the vest? --C messier 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
    As you can see, the light conditions were challenging. I prefer it as it is. --Kallerna 18:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Panoramic view over Commune 13, San Javier, in the direction of the Robledo district in Medellín, Colombia. --Carschten 09:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Overall good but there is a weird artifact at the top of the mast to the left. --C messier 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

January 8, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Palace of La Cotilla, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 08:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review The building looks a bit unnaturally distorted. -- Spurzem 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    The right side is leaning in a bit. --C messier 15:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

January 7, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Atanasie Stolojan in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It's too soft and blurry. It would be nice to crop out the shadow of the photographer. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 6, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: eGo Life in Berlin --MB-one 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Contrast needs to be significantly improved, also perspective and noise corrections, fixable? --Mike Peel 23:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done better? --MB-one 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    Nothing seems to have changed? --Mike Peel 22:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    Maybe, the old version is still cached? --MB-one 08:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
    @MB-one: OK, there was a caching issue here. New version is better, but too dark, can you lighten it? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks again --MB-one 21:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern part of lake Untreu seen from a bridge, black-white. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Beautiful, but I would suggest to try to get the midtones a bit brighter. Right now it looks a bit gloomy, making the midtones brighter would IMHO improve the overall impression. --Aristeas 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks, I did adjust it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Thank you! IMHO it’s even better now --Aristeas 19:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: San Carlo al Corso in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Is rotation necessary ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
    It is an easy fix, you can ask a bot to do it. --C messier 00:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    The request has been sent. --Tournasol7 05:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
    OK. But I'm not sure about the WB, as it looks a bit too blueish. --C messier 21:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

January 5, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 18:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Would be a great picture if it wouldn't have various ghosts due to long exposure. --Plozessor 05:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
    I don't find the ghosts distracting, but there is some chroma noise in the shadows. --C messier 13:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Ghosts + chroma noise, see previous comments --Plozessor 19:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Human.svg

• Nomination Figures of a man and a woman from the Pioneer plaque (by Gmaxwell). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Not created by a Commons user --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
   Support No offence, but please let us discuss what exactly the rules say to this special case. This is a SVG representation of a well-known (some would say: iconic) drawing. Because the SVG is a reproduction, I would expect the QI process to judge not the drawing, but the quality of the SVG representation. AFAIK the SVG has been created by a Commons user. So shoudln’t we accept this file and judge it on the base of the SVG representation – namely, whether it represents the original drawing accuratel and is of good technical quality? I would say so … --Aristeas 19:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Then the description is wrong. No issues with SVG representations of NASA works, but the description uses the template PD-NASA and clearly says that "This file is in the public domain in the United States because it was solely created by NASA.". If that is wrong, fix the description and then I'd support it. --Plozessor (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Good hint! Yes, then the template {{PD-NASA}} is somewhat misleading here. At least it should be amended by a hint stating that the vectorization was done by somebody else. --Aristeas 11:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

File:D-6-74-187-13_Marienstatue.jpg

• Nomination 1933 statue of Mary in Falsbrunn --Plozessor 05:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The clouds are overexposed, sorry. --Tournasol7 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I'd appreciate discussion about this 'overexposed clouds' issue. On a slightly cloudy day, you can't take a reasonable picture of an object in the shadow without parts of the brightest sunlit clouds overexposed. This could be worked around only with HDR, but I haven't read anywhere that HDR would be a prerequisite for QI. Personally, I would consider overexposed clouds a flaw in landscape photos, but not where the subject is a small object on the ground. --Plozessor 05:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose No need for HDR here, this is simply overexposed. Not only the clouds, but also some parts of the object itself are clipping. With better exposure and some s-curving the contrast could have been handled. Note: Always select the lowest possible ISO setting that still allows a blur-free photo. All digital cameras then record the largest possible contrast range. With each whole step higher ISO setting, one f-stop of contrast range is automagically lost. And this is then missing when you fiddle around with a JPG from the raw image. (Subsequent S-curving of an already "developed" JPG is only useful to a very limited extent, as this can easily lead to banding or torn tonal value gradients). --Smial 08:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Smial: This was taken with the "lowest possible ISO setting" that my camera offers (ISO 100), and of course I applied all settings during RAW conversion, I did NOT "fiddle around with a JPG". Still, even the contrast range of an APS-C sensor at ISO 100 might not be enough to provide high detail for an object in the shadow AND for the bright sunlit parts of clouds. With higher exposure we lose detail in the clouds, with lower exposure we lose detail in the shadows. The subject of the image is the statue (not the landscape), and QI guidelines specifically say that an image must have enough details "in the shadows", so I wanted to get the best possible representation of the statue and did not care about the clouds. --Plozessor 09:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• @Smial, @Tournasol7, I've found that I made another shot with lower exposure. Replaced the image now, please evaluate the new one (make sure you don't view the old version from cache). This has now probably less detail for the statue, but the overall exposure is better. --Plozessor 10:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Question Which part of the Rules do you refer to? I found "Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element." And: " In correctly exposed images, details in a significant part of image are retained. " - well in a photo with sky and clouds in the composition, these are always significant.My comment about the ISO settings was not meant as a personal criticism, but as a general help with a practical example for anyone who is happy to receive tips. --Smial 11:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Smial: Yeah, interesting, the description says "lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic" while the left column of that same row ("Exposure") lists "lost details in shadow areas" as an issue. Anyway, what do you think about the new version? --Plozessor 12:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 09:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 13:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Layla_-_Darkwah-104A1471.jpg

• Nomination Actor Darkwah at the premiere of the movie Layla at the 40th Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah --Frank Schulenburg 01:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
   Question Shouldn't persons' hair be complete on portraits? Most of these images have the heads cut off. --Plozessor 06:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
   Comment Cropping the hair at the top is a very common portait style. Of course this is a matter of taste, but IHMO we should not decline images just because they use a common style. --Aristeas 10:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment I tend to disagree with the "cropping the hair at the top is a very common portait style" statement. I could not find any reference that states that, and just checking a random portrait category like [Category:2011 portrait photographs of men], there are hardly any photos with the hair cropped. --Plozessor 14:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Here are some websites of commercial photographers (almost arbitrary selection) which show that cropping the hair is common with “headshots”:

• https://mackephotography.com/headshots/women/index.html
• https://wdyphotography.com/natural-light-headshots
• https://www.jordanmatter.com/photography/head-shots/actor-headshots/

We could find many more examples. I am not saying that one should do that, I just want to emphasize that this is a common style. Best, --Aristeas 19:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Depends on how you define "common", but the majority of portraits out there do not have the hair cut off. Anyway, in this particular case, the crop is really disturbing. Might be because that person's dark skin blends with the hair, so the photo gives the impression that the head is cut off. --Plozessor 05:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose There is insufficient categorization and other data. No caption, no "depicts" statement in the structured data, just a category for the event, nothing at all about the person on the photo. O.k., you can probably still find this image with the information from the file name and the description. And even if cutting a part of the hair off may be common style, this crop may impair the usability of the image, at least in my opinion. E.g., I would probably refrain from using this image for a Wikipedia article of the depicted person if I could find a good alternative image without this kind of crop. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support. Good image -- Spurzem 13:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Great portrait. Cutting off the top of the head is done to keep the eys on the upper portion of the frame, which is flattering for most face types. One is of course free to dislike the result, but technically it serves a purpose. --Julesvernex2 19:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

   Comment Thanks for your attempt to explain the intention of the crop. However, the downward shift of the eyes by not cutting off some hair would have been tiny in this case. IMO this is obvious from other (commercial) photos of the same person at the same event that can be found on the web. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

• I don't find the difference negligible, particularly if the photographer needs to stick to a 3:2 aspect ratio (often a requirement for this type of images, so they can be quickly added to a pre-formatted publication). Compare it to Getty's Darkwah Sundance image ([1]), for instance. The same 3:2 aspect ratio, but with no chopped off head and placing the eyes on the one-third line. It's also a perfectly fine portrait, but personally I prefer Frank's: a more intimate close-up, better skin tones, no shadow, and it doesn't cost €475 :-). I understand that you have a different preference, that's fine. From a technical perspective, however, I don't see why this image should fail QI (apart perhaps due to the plane of focus, which is not quite on the eyes). --Julesvernex2 09:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well exposed and, given the available lighting, quite well shot. Unfortunately, the focus is on the necklace and the hair, not the eyes. The cropping is a matter of taste, in my opinion it does not contribute to a better image effect in this case. Whether the landscape format is due to any agency specifications or production processes is, in my opinion, irrelevant for commons or QIC. --Smial 12:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Smial. --Tagooty 09:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Aristeas 19:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Senden,_Dortmund-Ems-Kanal,_Brücke_am_Kappenberger_Damm_--_2024_--_9875.jpg

• Nomination Bridge (Kappenberger Damm) over the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Outstanding. Unfortunately, the purpose of this technology remains a mystery to me. Even with perfect control, I consider them to be incompatible with the criteria for quality images. I don't see any benefit in such a distorted view of this bridge, even when it's intended. --Milseburg 14:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neutral Per Milseburg. Piece of art: Yes, QI: No. Also, even if ICM pictures would quality, this might not be a good example (it's tilted, the movement seems irregular). It's burned out and overcontrasted and has nothing to do with natural colors (which is ok for an artwork but not for QI.) --Plozessor 05:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Info Two things I can understand (even well): Criticism of the design of a photo, even if it was made with techniques such as ICM, and a certain discomfort with the evaluation. Thanks to those who give their criticism here objectively. I am aware that these pictures are much more difficult to judge and that opinions are likely to differ widely. Our rules have exceptions to the evaluation (e.g. for SVG) and not all criteria can apply to photos taken with ICM. The rules apply to FPC and QIC. Not everyone likes artistic photos, but they should also find a gap. They are an expression of creative photography and thus part of our Wikimedia Commons world. The topic can be discussed in principle, but I see no reason to do so with this image. We must also remember that in addition to creative photographers, we also have those who take realistic pictures and have other Wikimedia projects in mind. --XRay 08:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• @XRay: I'd appreciate a general discussion on the Discussions page about the question: What kind of images QI is about. My personal opinion is that QI should be somehow usable to illustrate Wikipedia. This would, however, rule out this type of pictures which are not useful to illustrate anything except the artistic technology used to create them. But, maybe that would be enough? Would be interesting to hear other opinions on that. --Plozessor 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

• I don't want to offend anyone. To put it bluntly: if our goal here was exclusively Wikipedia, I would say goodbye. I'm passionate about photography and its diversity and possibilities. It's important to me to try things out, to develop. This also includes creative approaches. I also take the more concrete photos that are suitable for Wikipedia. Not every photo is successful. But that's not everything for me. As has already been mentioned here, the Wikipedia-only approach is outdated and we should critically revise the rules for the FPC and QIC. --XRay 11:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
• First of all, the images here (including QIs) also serve all the other Wikipedia's sister projects. List: Template:Wikipedia's sister projects, so let's put out the notion that images should only be for Wikipedias. Take a look at how wide the WikiProject really is, and how many different sorts of images this requires. Second, even artistic images like ICM can be used to illustrate Wikipedia articles. --W.carter 12:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Changing my vote to neutral for now, until we get a consensus whether this type of photo qualifies for QI. Still, @XRay: is the tilt in this picture intentional? --Plozessor 13:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

• I also thought about whether it was really tilted or not. It's difficult with this type of picture. The bridge is curved and this can at least create the effect. No tripod is used. --XRay 13:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support The QI rules have been formulated in a time when Commons was mostly a repository for Wikipedia illustrations – functional, tidy, and mostly very mediocre photographs (please don’t take this personally: all of my own photographs are very mediocre and boring, too). Over time Commons has matured to a general archive of free media for many purposes. If we punish creative photography, we turn away exactly our best photographers. So the QI rules certainly need an update. However IMHO we can already assess photos like this one when we follow the idea of a “quality image” idea and interpret the rules in that spirit. For a photo like this one, we may ask: Is the overall technical quality OK? Has the creative technique, here: the intentional camera movement, been selected for a subject for which it is fitting? Has the creative technique been used successfully, i.e. has it enriched the photography to express something or to give an impression which would not have been possible with a “normal” photograph? IMHO the answer is yes in this case. Best, --Aristeas 11:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment What is the content that this image wants to communicate? The image stands out clearly from the others and is therefore certainly interesting. But if such alienation becomes fashionable in the future and all possible motifs are presented in this or a similar way, a separate award should be set up for it. There seems to be more focus on art and creativity than objective quality standards. Certainly this is not what anyone looking for a quality image of this bridge needs. --Milseburg 17:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

• Does every picture have to convey content? And maybe someone is just looking for an abstract representation of the bridge and is happy to find these pictures here too. Who knows? --XRay 08:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

• Just to be clear, at least for me there's no doubt that your picture should be in Commons. The only question is whether it can be a QI, mainly because it's impossible to apply most of the relevant criteria to it. --Plozessor 10:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

How do you judge "exposure" for an image that is intentionally overexposed?

How do you judge "color" for an image that intentionally uses false colors?

How do you judge "focus" for an image that is out of focus intentionally?

How do you judge "blur" for an image that is intentionally blurred?

How do you judge "distortion" for an image that is intentionally distorted?

--Plozessor 10:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

• To be honest, that sounds like a desperate search for a set of rules. I certainly remember such discussions, e.g. for image resolution in wildlife photography. Certainly some things are difficult to name. Is the shot just blurred or is it a design element? We even have categories for both: Intentionally blurred images and Blurred images. --XRay 10:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

• Exactly, "a set of rules" is required to decide whether something is a QI or not. Obviously the existing "rules" - exposure, color, focus, blur, etc. - are not really suitable for judging artistic images like yours. So we need some criteria: What makes an artistic image an artistic quality image? Do you have suggestions? --Plozessor 14:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support For me this is a kind of photographic quality I would like to see more of --Kritzolina 08:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can't see anything. --Sebring12Hrs 13:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support If we want to be objective, given the constraints foreseen for Q.I., the conditions should not exist because they mainly involve overcoming technical aspects. I think there needs to be an overhaul when it comes to creativity. Movement or, more precisely, blur have always been viewed with horror, as one of the mistakes to absolutely avoid. Through blurring we can create fairy-tale atmospheres or give a particular dynamism to the photos and, why not, use the camera as if it were a brush with which to spread colors on a canvas. Photography thus (in my opinion) becomes art. Photos don't just have to be documentation. I believe that xRay has the right to "create" emotions and sensations through photography that go beyond the simple subject photographed. In these cases the objective standards leave room for subjective sensations, so I don't feel like criticizing those who voted negatively, simply because they did not receive sufficient emotions or they were not convinced by the creator's work. --Terragio67 21:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Neutral I have a similar opinion as User:Plozessor. I just cannot understand what the criteria should be for evaluation of the quality of such an image. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment If you look at other pictures done with that technique, you will soon see the differences. This one has very clear lines that speak of the intent (many don't). The coloring is very interesting, nothing ist just an unclear mushy grey or brown. We can see the bridge and something I would call the idea of the bridge. This is really high quality. --Kritzolina 17:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose The picture is quite pretty, but the blurring serves no technical purpose or to emphasise a particular feature of an object. A canal bridge like this is not usually travelling very fast. I don't think QIC is the right place to judge artistic expression. And even if I am of the opinion that a photo can become QI even if the photographer does not slavishly adhere to the usual, customary rules of composition, I do not feel called upon to judge artistic value. Apart from that, a photo of this type should not show any image noise (if blurred, then at least consistently) and no overexposed areas. --Smial 07:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Milseburg. --Augustgeyler 13:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Milseburg and Smial. I think QI as it exists is not the place for this image. --Tagooty 09:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 13:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Clouds_at_the_edge_of_Netravati_peak_from_the_summit_of_the_mountain_(2).jpg

• Nomination Clouds at the edge of Netravati peak from the summit of the mountain --IM3847 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Borderline sharpness, but ok at lower resolution --Plozessor 17:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
   Oppose Nearly half of the image is overexposed. Can you recover the highlights? --C messier 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness is ok. But must agree to C messier, Whites are clipping. --Smial 11:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --C messier 21:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Risstal_03_–_Richtung_Almdorf_Eng.jpg

• Nomination Rißtal (valley of the river Riss) in Tyrol, Austria. --Cayambe 09:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blue hue doesn't look natural. --Draceane 10:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• weak Oppose Indeed the sky is a bit purple, should be easy to fix in raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Removing my vote as I have retouched the file. --Plozessor 11:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Done Blue hue reduced. Better now?--Cayambe 19:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Cayambe: Unfortunately not, now it's really bad. You somehow reduced the saturation of the mountains and sky, but also of a part of the trees. Now the trees below the mountain are green at the bottom and grey at the top. You should take the original version and change purple to blue. In Photoshop you'd do that with selective color adjustment, select purple tones and adjust the tone to be more blue and less purple. --Plozessor 19:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Plozessor. The 'selective color adjustment' works best for the RAW file, which inadvertently I had deleted and is lost now. I was not successful in performing the purple-blue toning correction in the tiff-version in PS. Best regards,--Cayambe 11:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Cayambe: @Draceane: Gave it a try myself, what do you think? --Plozessor 11:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Why and in which cases should "selective colour adjustment" actually be necessary for landscape photos? (Serious question. With this photo here, it seems to have gone thoroughly wrong, in every version.) --Smial 13:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: I guess something went wrong in raw conversion. In any case, in the original picture, all colors looked fine except for shades of blue, those appeared slightly purple. Adjusting brightness and hue for shades of blue improved the appearance. Of course it would have been better to adjust colors during raw conversion, but unfortunately the author does not have the raw file anymore. --Plozessor 14:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: @Plozessor: It still appears a bit strange, we're not used to see neither colors in the reality. It's a pity, the capture is really nice, but I cannot get over the bluish hues. --Draceane 20:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi all of you :-), distant rocky mountains always appear with a bluish hue in photos... and also in TV cameras and screens, this simply because these mountains appear in reality like that. If we don't see that hue, it is because our brain corrects it to a greyish colour, similarly to the correction of the reddish hue of a white sheet of paper under a lamp with reddish light. I agree that this hue should be corrected... similarly to the perspective correction. --Cayambe 16:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

@Cayambe: That can be debated (and whether the picture should be retouched to meet human perception). But in this case, no issue with blue, the original problem was that the mountains and sky were not blue but purple. --Plozessor 05:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Mon 15 Jan → Tue 23 Jan
• Tue 16 Jan → Wed 24 Jan
• Wed 17 Jan → Thu 25 Jan
• Thu 18 Jan → Fri 26 Jan
• Fri 19 Jan → Sat 27 Jan
• Sat 20 Jan → Sun 28 Jan
• Sun 21 Jan → Mon 29 Jan
• Mon 22 Jan → Tue 30 Jan
• Tue 23 Jan → Wed 31 Jan