Commons:Requests for rights

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:RFR)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:RFR

edit this message

How to make a request

  1. First make sure you clicked the correct edit-link and you are actually requesting the right you want.
  2. Copy the following and append it to the text-area: 
    {{subst:rfr|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|2=reason}} Thank you. ~~~~
  3. Replace reason with a rationale based on the rollback guideline, renaming guideline or the patroller guideline.
  4. Press Publish changes.

Note

  • Please check back periodically so you can respond to any queries.
  • If your request has remained unanswered for several days, consider personally asking an administrator.
  • Administrators, please welcome users granted a new right with an appropriate message.
  • When requesting rights that need support by the community (e.g. administrator) please go to Commons:Requests and votes!

If you request the rollback-right, please read the how-to first.

Admins and anyone with global rollback don't need to request rollback. License reviewers don't have to request the patrol flag.


Confirmed[edit]

See also: Confirmed users.

Autopatrol[edit]

See also: Autopatrolled users.


Randam[edit]

Hi. I have been contributing to the Commons and Dutch Wikipedia since 2007 and have uploaded 928 files so far. I would appreciate being granted Autopatrol rights in order to crop and overwrite portraits. Thank you. Randam (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MasterRus21thCentury[edit]

I have been a member of Wikimedia Commons since November 28, 2018, but I became truly active only in the summer of 2021, taking my own photographs and uploading images from free sites. I also replaced low-resolution files with higher resolution ones until the end of October, which corresponds to the interest of the community. In this regard, I am applying for the status of a self-patrolled participant. Thank you. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@MasterRus21thCentury, why did you get blocked on ruwiki? Kadı Message 16:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kadı This is due to the fact that the quality of translations of articles left much to be desired and the Russian section of Wikipedia sought to grow much more actively (there are about 300 million native Russian speakers in the world). Moreover, until the moment of blocking on Wikipedia, I knew very little about the Foundation’s subsidiary projects.
As a result, I am actively developing Russian topics in Wikidata (the Russia wiki project was also founded) - this is the creation of new properties for various sites in the form of encyclopedias, reference books, etc. I do not lose hope of recovering, given that my range of areas on Wikipedia is extremely diverse - from journalism to history, etc. Moreover, in the spring of this year the application for unlocking was rejected.
On Wikimedia Commons, I have plans to replace photographs with high resolution ones (this applies to Russian government websites, including the website of the President of Russia kremlin.ru, which has subdomains putin.kremlin.ru and 20.kremlin.ru with high-resolution photographs). This is also a check for edits by anonymous participants, if any. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

源義信[edit]

Hi, I've been working on Commons for years with over 40,000 edits. Recently I found that I need the right to overwrite files uploaded by other users. While I am mainly working on old photographs and sometimes paintings, I need to overwrite many images of low quality (usually from bad sources) with high-quality images from better sources. Thank you. 源義信 (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why did you make this overwrite with a totally different file at File:Vua Tự Đức.jpg. And even if you are the original uploader do not make major changes like you did on File:Painter Lê Thị Lựu and her husband Ngô Thế Tân in Bắc Ninh, 1935.jpg one year after the original upload. GPSLeo (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As for File:Vua Tự Đức.jpg, why do you think its totally different? The previous file was imported by other users from a Flickr page. The Flickr user just downloaded the same file as I uploaded later, cropped it, and made some adjustment. What I did was uploading the higher resolution original image without those improvements. 源義信 (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As for File:Painter Lê Thị Lựu and her husband Ngô Thế Tân in Bắc Ninh, 1935.jpg, firstly, I consider it as a minor change because the two versions are the same photograph while the previous one is cropped (but the subject of the image was not changed). Thus when I found the higher resolution image, I replaced the former with it. I read the guideline and did not found that there is a time limit for minor improvements (as for me it's neither substantial changes or completely unrelated files). Secondly, the file is only used in one article and the update won't affect the use of this file in the article. 源義信 (talk) 13:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment In my opinion this is a bit nitpicky. The user clearly has a large amount of quality edits and has been here long enough to deserve a permission like autopatrolled. —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm slightly concerned about this user's understanding of copyright. They had two videos speedily deleted six months ago for not actually having a Creative Commons license at YouTube. So I'm on the fence about granting autopatrol or not. Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've decided to grant this user autopatroller on a 3-month trial basis. ✓ Done If no issues, will extend to permanent. Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NorthTension[edit]

Recently I've just been attempting to resize to selection large files (specific Inkscape command, it shrinks the transparent canvas so an image doesn't have a ton of dead transparent space, cf this file history), harmonizing color schemes of flags (i;e the Soviet flags), and reverting and reporting vandalism issues (reports are on the Wikipedia Discord). While I still do vehemently disagree with the change in rules I would like to ask for autopatrol rights to continue to do the minor tweaks and fixes I've been doing for the past few months. I do recognize that there were multiple copyright violations listed on me but those were a result of uploading on a friend's behalf (actual warnings by Yann) and then resizing some of his files after he ended up uploading them themselves (error on HapHaxion's fault that caused me to accidentally get flagged). Since I've been kind of completely wiped as a result of that rule change and other stuff going on in my life I've been taking time recently to getting an actual proper understanding of COM:L and COM:TOO with the help of Mdaniels5757 and I'd like to be able to continue contributing the way I have for the past few months. Thank you. NorthTension (talk) 02:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OfficialURL[edit]

About three years ago, I set out to replace the ugly gray backgrounds on the files in this category. They clashed quite heavily with the infoboxes in which they were used, e.g. w:Uniform polyhedron compound. Later, when I learned how to do it, I started replacing similar files' white backgrounds with transparent backgrounds, such as in this category (the files with Schlegel in their name). Unfortunately, at the time, I didn't have time to continue this change, and now the files are mismashed between transparent and not. I'd like autopatrol so I can complete this change. Thank you. viiii (talk) 23:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SteveLLL[edit]

I need to update (overwrite) all road sign images in China that do not comply with the current standards after the new national standards are released.
@SteveLLL: If the new design is substantially different, you'd need to upload them as new files per Commons:Overwriting existing files. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The difference in the new standard is not significant, mainly due to the use of new fonts. On the other hand, these files are named in a specific format for template calls, and there is reason to think that these files need to be updated. Some of the existing documents comply with current standards, some use old standards, and some do not comply with any standards due to user deviations. There are so many of them (1k+) that it would be impractical to rename and change the template for every file that doesn't meet the standards. SteveLLL (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SuperSkaterDude45[edit]

I've been uploading images since 2021 and have around 1,156 edits as of writing this. I'm requesting auto patrol rights to upload either higher quality or full resolution historical images that were uploaded by abandoned accounts at Commons. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 11:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How do you explain the very high number of photos uploaded by you they are now deleted? GPSLeo (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@GPSLeo: Two of them (File:Peter Osgood 1970.jpg and File:West Germany vs Morocco 1970.jpg currently have no known authors but were deleted regardless of that. File:Héctor Pulido.jpg was deleted as a different image under the same name was uploaded by Cementero (despite no known authors nor publication being cited in a reverse image search for my own upload) while File:Celia Cruz 1971.jpg is actually in the public-domain per {{PD-Peru-photo}} although the undeletion request was unusually inactive. A majority of the others that were actually deleted primarily revolved around images relating to football where the links I had found them didn't give explicit authorship until their deletion requests. Regardless as of writing this, there are currently 11 images uploaded by me that were deleted in contrast to the nearly 1,000 other images I have uploaded that have remained here. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 03:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Even if the photograph in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peter Osgood 1970.jpg didn't have a known author, it's still very likely under copyright as a British photograph, and therefore also still under copyright in the United States. We delete files when the copyright status is uncertain under COM:PCP. You as the uploader have the burden of showing that they are public domain or freely licensed. COM:EVID. Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Abzeronow: Pretty sure anonymous works are exactly in-line with {{PD-Mexico}} given no newspaper publication was cited either with the only known information being its date. Either way, that isn't really the main point for this request. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 06:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eothan[edit]

I am a GLAM worker and specialise in historic images. Where possible I update poor quality, unlicenced and unlinked files to original catalogues Thank you. Eothan (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please do not overwrite files if the new version has very different colors like at File:Crossing of Blue Mountains, 1880.jpg and even if the crop is also different like at File:Kate Kelly, sister of Ned Kelly.jpg. GPSLeo (talk) 15:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Eothan: Do you have a response? Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi - Yes the original is actually an photomechanical engraving (of which there are probably many version and copies in Library's and museums etc) and when first published would have been b/w. The source image is an RGB copy of the original engraving made in the C19th and printed onto albumen paper. This paper (as is the case with almost all albumen paper) has become discoloured in the highlights and leading to the yellow cast over the whole picture. 9of99 over wrote the first version with a b/w copy which they desaturated and cropped. The higher re version I uploaded is in keeping with that intent and has also been desaturated and to make the image clearer and to make sure I didn't clutter commons with multiple copies of the same image. The Kate Kelly image is an original photochemical albumen print and I used it to overwrite low res images which were poorer quality versions taken from this original carte-de-visite. As such the crop and image I uploaded is more faithful to the original than the overwritten ones. Again it didn't seem to be sensible to upload another version of what is essentially the same image (but of better quality and sourced back to the original location of the photo in the institution that stores it) to Wikicommons. Also I thought it was important to update the caption referencing and link information of the item as this may prove helpful for researchers wanting to re-use and caption the image correctly in publications outside Wikipedia. Eothan (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RuzDD[edit]

While i am not very experienced on there, i made more than 800 edits on the trwiki and i know the importance of copyrights. I am also a white list (it is nearly smilar to autopatrol) on the trwiki for a long time. I want this right to be able to upload MP3's, and i have good reasons to want that. My reasons can be found at the history tab of the help desk. Thank you. RuzDD (talk) 14:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Right, that would be current section COM:HD#MP3 Uploading.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This topic does not contain my reasons to upload MP3's, and they can be found at the history, but this link also may be useful. Thank you. RuzDD (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Havsjö[edit]

I correct errors and the size of svg files. Just now I was trying to adjust the colour hue of File:Flag of March of Verona and Aquileia.svg to closer match other Holy Roman Empire flags, as well as to remove the transparent gaps in the edges when I discorved I need this new permission Thank you. Havsjö (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Seeing a copyvio from November 2023 is a little concerning to me, and your overwrite of File:Adrian von Renteln.jpg should have been done as a new file. Abzeronow (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But that von Renteln file is literally the same photo --Havsjö (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The tone is different (sepia vs black and white) and your version shows more of the shoulders and chest. The color change alone should have had it as a different file. Abzeronow (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


BocaJuniors00[edit]

Hi, I've always been working on Boca Juniors kits, doing small or big changes. Sometimes I do it on files that already exist in order to keep the name that says the year it represents. Now I can't keep doing it, and if a want to make some changes on a kit, I have to create a different file and invent a new name for it. I've always worked on someone else's files without a problem, like this one or this one, just to show a few examples. Thank you. BocaJuniors00 (talk) 04:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AutoWikiBrowser access[edit]

See also: Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON.

Patroller[edit]

See also: Patrol guideline.

DefenderTienMinh07[edit]

I'd love to be granted this right for patrol purposed only in reverting vandalism, I'm really good patching issues, and I have 1 year experience on this job (you can see my contributions on English Wikipedia and Vietnamese Wiktionary for a proof). I hope I am suitable on this position, thanks. DefenderTienMinh07 (talk) 16:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm willing to grant you autopatroller status. I don't see a lot of recent activity (within the last three months) as far as reverts or maintenance stuff on Commons. I'll wait to see if someone else wants to opine before I make a decision though. Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abzeronow I'm greatly appreciate your confidence sir, I'll try my best to be an integrity patroller, this might help increase both the admin (who granted the right to me) and my prestige if I do nothing wrong. DefenderTienMinh07 (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just to be clear, I granted autopatrol which automatically marks your edits as patrolled. It is a different right from patroller. Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I believe reverting vandalism on Commons is a way different from English and else. Maybe demonstrate for a month using anti-vandalism tools? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done I really don't see the need. ─ The Aafī (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rollback[edit]

See also: Rollback guideline.

Template editor[edit]

See also: Template editors.

Filemover[edit]

See also: Renaming guideline.

BahYajé e Y4guarEtã[edit]

Contribuo ativamente com recursos de mídia a partir de um projeto da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina em parceria com a SETEC no Brasil, a equipe de cadastro Wiki que ajudo a gerenciar tem mais três pessoas e no trabalho de revisão as vezes é necessário renomear algum arquivo e isso me leva a necessidade do estatuto de movedor de ficheiros. As ações de renomeação não entram em conflito com a política de renomeação e meu trabalho fica restrito apenas às mídias do projeto. Desde já agradeço. Thank you. BahYajé e Y4guarEtã (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support, trustworthy user. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@BahYajé e Y4guarEtã: Hi. Extremely sorry for very late and replying in English. I see only 4 rename requests made from your account and none are recent. How often do you think you'll require these permissions? If there are rare cases, I think it can be handled well by existing filemovers, but I'll happy to grant the rights on trial base if you plan to help at CAT:RENAME, too. Please advise. (Google Translate: Oi. Sinto muito pelo atraso e por responder em inglês. Vejo apenas quatro solicitações de renomeação feitas na sua conta e nenhuma é recente. Com que frequência você acha que precisará dessas permissões? Se houver casos raros, acho que isso pode ser bem resolvido pelos movimentadores de arquivos existentes, mas ficarei feliz em conceder os direitos em base experimental se você planeja ajudar em CAT:RENAME também. Por favor, avise.) -- CptViraj (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(DeepL Translate:Greetings CptViraj!
The requests I've made are rare because we've almost always found a workaround so that we don't have to move the files. However, at the end of the year the number of media registrations increased considerably, some at the final stage of the production flow, and this meant that the process needed to be speeded up. That's why the statute is necessary.
I can contribute to CAT:RENAME according to the parameters of the renaming policy. Answering your question about "how often do you think you'll need these permissions?": I can do up to 3 renames a week.) ( Original em pt-BR: Saudações CptViraj!
As solicitações que fiz são raras pois quase sempre achávamos uma alternativa para não ser necessário movimentar os arquivos. No entanto, no final do ano a quantidade de cadastro de mídias aumentou bastante, alguns na etapa final do fluxo de produção e isso acarretava uma necessidade de agilidade no processo. Por isso o estatuto se faz necessário.
Posso contribuir em CAT:RENAME segundo os parâmetros da política de renomeação.
Respondendo a sua pergunta sobre "com que frequência você acha que precisará dessas permissões?": Posso realizar até 3 renomeações por semana.)
BahYajé e Y4guarEtã (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Granted on probation of 3 months, can be permanently promoted after review of moves made in these 3 months. I see lake of sufficient use but the user is trusted and the request is pending for a long time now. Please come back after expiration. Thanks! (Google Translate: Concedido em período probatório de 3 meses, podendo ser promovido permanentemente após análise das movimentações realizadas nesses 3 meses. Vejo lago de uso suficiente, mas o usuário é confiável e a solicitação está pendente há muito tempo. Por favor, volte após a expiração. Obrigado!) -- CptViraj (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Emerson Júnior GSF[edit]

Desejo ter o direito de renomear algum arquivo para substituir o nome errôneo do File:Sede da Equatorial Energia Goiás.jpg, tendo ciência das minhas responsabilidades para realizar uma renomeação coerente, necessária e responsável. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 00h40min de 13 de dezembro de 2023 (UTC)

Emerson Júnior GSF Para renomear um único arquivo, você não precisa se tornar renomeador, basta pedir a renomeação e um renomeador fará a renomeação.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kacamata Certo. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nowakki[edit]

I need the right to rename files that start with "Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from". Approval from other interested parties given here. A redirect will be placed for the obsolete files. Thank you. Nowakki (talk) 02:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I still need to rename Sanborn maps. Why is this a problem?
All Sanborn Fire Insurance Map files are uniquely identified by: Name of Location, Year, Volume, Plate number
The person previously engaged in uploading them used none of these, but instead used Library of Congress-invented IDs:
shelf number (one per city), shelf volume, sequence number.
The old naming scheme is awkward to use (sequence number is usually not helpful when searching for a plate, a user will
have to click on a few files to narrow down where a plate is) and it is
also not the most natural way to organize the files. The year/volume/plate number scheme is used by the maps internally throughout and it is the indexing scheme one will naturally adopt when using the maps and it is also how Sanborn originally organized their work. I did not invent it.
I have already uploaded 80,000 new plates using the new naming scheme, so this is pretty much a foregone conclusion.
See User:Nowakki/test3, 19th century plates are with the old scheme, 20th century plates with the new scheme.

Thank you. Nowakki (talk) 22:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please request a bot flag. See your talk page. I suggest that you request at least a few manual renaming before being granted the right. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You mean i should actually do what is conveniently displayed in table form at User:Nowakki/test3?
What purpose would that serve? Nowakki (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The criteria include "or a large amount of justified renaming requests at Commons before they will consider granting the filemover right." BTW I merged this with your duplicate request above. Yann (talk) 10:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think that does not apply to a situation where rights are requested to fulfill a particular requirement.
I am not asking to be filemover for anything but this.
Either you want the files renamed or you don't. If i do a couple hundred the old way, you have nothing new to base your decision on. If you don't want it, say so now, not when you then have to repair the test run later. Nowakki (talk) 10:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually, it is your insistence to by-pass the requirement which is a problem. Why don't you just fill up a dozen manual requests (I asked for "a few".)? Yann (talk) 11:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nowakki: I strongly suggest that you comply. What are you waiting for?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i think the requirement is for a large amount of justified renaming requests.
I only have a single justification. Nowakki (talk) 12:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nowakki: That doesn't matter, you have a large amount of files to rename.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You really think that a person that moves a hundred files for the same reason becomes by that qualified to move files in general? The important thing is that the judgement is successfully applied repeatedly, not that the procedure is executed. Nowakki (talk) 13:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nowakki: Can you prove that you can successfully use your judgement and apply the procedure once?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:15, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
8 files moved.
c:Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Provo, Utah County, Utah 1888
the category is also one of a few that uses an unusual seperation of jpg and tiff files. i would harmonize that and like in the entire rest of the collection put tiff and jpg side by side in one category. Nowakki (talk) 13:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G.: what else do you need. i have proven that i can click the buttons. lets hope my script has no bug.
i can give you a regexp that all renames will conform to, so that my actions can be limited properly. does wikimedia even have a procedure for that kind of thing? Nowakki (talk) 05:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nowakki: Thank you. Please note that the the "tif" (one "f") extensions you chose to give our RenameLink gadget were changed to "tiff" (two "f"s) by the software as used by Richardkiwi, for instance forming name File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Provo, Utah County, Utah, 1888, Plate 0004.tiff. Personally, I prefer "tif" (one "f") extensions for compatibility with three character filename extensions on IBM PCs of 40 years ago too (I'm old school like that), but please use the new "tiff" (two "f"s) extensions.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i will if you answer my question. Nowakki (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nowakki: You may paste in a regexp here or in your request for a bot flag.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

" Oppose - Sanborn maps are being renamed (in a few days they will be ready, so I don't rename it). So this user wants the rights only for this. Also for a bot, they need experience with renaming. So my conclusion is to please don't give rename rights to this user. Nothing against him/her (them), but there is no need now to give the rights.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kano Tchapi[edit]

Mon objectif principal en obtenant et en veillant à l'exactitude des titres de contenus sur Wiki Commons est de faciliter les recherches, le classement et l'organisation des contenus visuels associés à chaque contenus. En tant que leader au sein d'une communauté et facilitateur de plusieurs projets, je m'efforce de garantir que les médias visuels sont facilement accessibles et correctement identifiés. Une structuration précise des titres permet une navigation fluide et une gestion efficace du contenu, ce qui est essentiel pour soutenir un large éventail d'utilisateurs dans la recherche et l'utilisation de ces ressources visuelles.(talk) 13:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    • My first reaction is that this suggests that you don't understand well how renaming works here. Normally, we do not rename files unless there is something actively wrong with the name. Before granting you the right to do renaming yourself: can you say roughly how many renames you have requested in the past, and roughly how many of those were granted? - Jmabel ! talk 22:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      Aucun renommage,jusqu’à présent. Ça sera ma première fois d’y procéder Kani Beat (talk) 09:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done: @Kani Beat: Please file a few rename requests in accordance with COM:FR, and then come back here once you have demonstrated that you know how this works. Best regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Queen of Hearts[edit]

I only have 425 edits, but I have made around 15 renaming requests, mainly working through User:Dispenser/Double extension, all but one (which was moved to a different title) have been granted. File mover would allow me to work through this faster without flooding CAT:RENAME. I also notice CAT:RENAME quite often is backlogged, and I could help out with this. (If it's worth mentioning, I'm also a page mover and have 20k edits on enwiki.) Thank you. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 07:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Queen of Hearts: Page-moving is way different than file-moving but I don't see a reason not to grant. ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


HouseBlaster[edit]

I believe I have a history of requesting files be moved in accordance with Commons:File renaming. The only "not moved" outcome in the past year would be from this request (which I requested as the uploader), but I self-reverted a few minutes later. Thank you! HouseBlaster (talk) 05:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Looks sensible. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Lady3mlnm[edit]

I periodically create and upload many charts using scripts, and sometimes I understand that I have used a bad name or have made just a typo. Sometimes I understand that it is better to use another scheme of file names. Using scripts has consequence that a bad name or typo can occur in many files simultaneously. Therefore I ask to provide me the right of filemover so that I can fix names of my files myself. I consider that I already have enough experience. Thank you. Lady3mlnm (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Lady3mlnm, How many file renames have you likely requested previously? ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The Aafī, I suppose, 30-50. Though the most renames were identical to each other. More than 10 unique renames. ─ Lady3mlnm (talk) 17:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The Aafī, History of my requests ─ Lady3mlnm (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Seems fine to me. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Meghmollar2017[edit]

I have been uploading images, graphics and maps on Commons periodically. Sometimes there happens to be some mistakes that needs to be corrected in the title. Again, the right will be helpful as I have to deal with other uploaders (especially newcomers) as a part of Project Korikath. Thank you. — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 20:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload Wizard campaign editors[edit]

See also: Upload Wizard campaign editors.

Translation administrator and Account creator[edit]

See also: Translation administrators and Account creators.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_rights&oldid=844101648"