Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
53,914 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 48,433 (89.8%) 
Undecided
  
 3,009 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,472 (4.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Danseur dit à l'écharpe Royaume de Champa (Vietnam), Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
  • Their mistake. We shouldn't promulgate it. The scarf dance is a big thing in Vietnam. Can you change it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Oppose Misleading title. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment We do not discuss the title of the titles of the works which are given by the museums --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support I think Archaeodontosaurus has a point. The title of the museum is leading.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment The English title in the image page "Dancer called with a scarf" is strange. Could you please clarify whether this English title is displayed in the museum? If not, better translations are "Dancer with a scarf" or "Scarf dancer". (Disclaimer: I do not know French, I've consulted DeepL.com and my wife who is fluent in English and French.) --Tagooty (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Tagooty: Hi. The title in French contains a Gallicism. The title not having been given by the author, it was the museum curator who named it: the dancer with the scarf; but to mark that he is the author of this title he added said to the scarf. For me, I try not to take the liberty of interpreting museum data. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support Thanks for the clarification. Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 06:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-17 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Sign of the art of the Giupponeri (men's tailor) - Correr Museum
  • I cannot understand Google's translation. Says tailors, but the drawing does not appear to be about clothes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment We do not discuss the title of the titles of the works which are given by the museums--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I'm not questioning the tile, but a translation into English (or French) would make the image valuable. I have no idea what the image represents. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • ✓ Done Ok I didn't understand... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment When I click on the scope, I don't see the photo. Shouldn't the scope be Collection of painted signs from the Correr Museum? Then I'll see the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Famberhorst: ✓ Done Thank you, your interventions are always positive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support Useful & Used. --Famberhorst (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-18 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Sula leucogaster plotus (Brown booby) female in flight
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-19 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Italian wine amphora (Dressel 1 B type) - Musée Saint-Raymond Toulouse

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-19 06:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Pan - Satyr with Pan-pipe by Andrea Briosco from the Correr Museum

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-19 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Sitatapatra, 18th century Mongolia - Musée Georges Labit, Toulouse
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-18 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Sula leucogaster plotus (Brown booby) female feeding chick
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-18 17:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Sula leucogaster plotus (Brown booby) female on nest

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-18 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Sula leucogaster plotus (Brown booby) pair (female left - on nest; male right)

 Comment As this shows the pair in/around a nest, scope is better linked to Category:Sula leucogaster plotus nests and the file moved there. --Tagooty (talk) 13:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-19 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple (Srirangapatna) - Prakaram (outer wall), view from south-west
Used in:
en:Prakaram • en:Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangapatna • wikidata:Q124315992
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-19 12:55 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Joseph's Cathedral, Prayagraj (Allahabad) - Altar with Christmas decorations
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-19 13:02 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Joseph's Cathedral, Prayagraj (Allahabad) - right side altar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-01-19 17:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Tongerense Heide Nature reserve on the Veluwe in the Netherlands. Damaged Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-20 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Male bust - Renaissance work from Antiquity (N°23) - Museo Archeologico Nazionale Venice

 Comment There are about 200 busts in the linked CAT. Is it possible to link to a more specific CAT? --Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • @Tagooty: Unfortunately there is only the museum inventory number here "23", I add it to the scope. It's laconic, which is a shame because the work is very beautiful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • A search for Accession number = 23 returned only this one image.
     Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 07:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-20 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Fortuny, già Pesaro Orfei in Venice - Entrance.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-20 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Lion dressé Royaume de Champa (Vietnam), Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-19 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Lichmera indistincta indistincta (Brown honeyeater)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-19 18:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Cereopsis novaehollandiae (Cape barren geese) in flight
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-19 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Cereopsis novaehollandiae (Cape barren goose)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-01-20 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Volvo CMA platform
Used in:
de:Geely Xingyue S, de:Geely Xingrui, de:Geely Xingyue L, de:Geely Boyue L, en:Compact Modular Architecture platform, fi:CMA-pohjalevy, ja:ボルボ・CMA, ru:Compact Modular Architecture, tr:Kompakt Modüler Mimari platformu
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Balles2601 (talk) on 2024-01-20 18:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Bembecia astragali female imago.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-20 18:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mahamaya Irrigation Dam Regulator (east-west axis)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-21 06:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Battagli nelle acque di Mitilene, Museo Correr in Venice
  •  Support The image best fits into the above mentioned scope. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-21 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana (Venice) - Interior - Reading room - La Sansoviniana
  • It's a bit dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yes all the curtains are closed.Oui tous les rideaux sont fermés. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Bien sur; But you could lighten the image (and perspective correction?). Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Apart from the floor and the windows, the room is covered with paintings which are protected from light, this atmosphere is typical of the Sansoviniana today. A correction of perspective would distort the ceiling too much, which is much more important than the canvases on the walls. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-21 06:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Ceiling of the Ballroom by Giuseppe Borsato in the Royal Palace (Correr Museum) Venice
  •  Support The picture fulfills the above mentioned scope in a fitting way. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-21 11:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Irediparra gallinacea novaehollandiae (Comb-crested jacana) chick

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-21 11:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Irediparra gallinacea novaehollandiae (Comb-crested jacana) juvenile
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Radomianin (talk) on 2024-01-21 12:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Quercus robur Pferdekopfeiche, protected landscape Ivenacker Eichen
Used in:
de:Ivenack • wikidata:Pferdekopfeiche • commons:Ivenack
Reason:
The giant oak "Pferdekopfeiche" (Horse-head oak) in the German nature reserve "Ivenacker Eichen" is about 700 years old, has a circumference of almost 9 meters, and is 23 meters high. It is the third-strongest oak in the reserve, and only a third of its crown is still alive. I think the current condition of the diseased but still living tree is well represented in this picture. -- Radomianin (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) on 2024-01-21 13:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Jacques Delors, 1993, portrait photography
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-21 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Trichosurus vulpecula (Common brushtail possum) with joey

Note that this image is an FP on English Wikipedia and the lead image.

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
M 93 (talk) on 2024-01-21 16:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz C236 — front view
Used in:
en:Mercedes-Benz CLE
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
M 93 (talk) on 2024-01-21 16:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz C236 — rear view
Used in:
en:Mercedes-Benz CLE
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-01-21 17:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of the Terp fan de Takomst Northeast east side.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-21 18:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Ning Yeung Wui Kuan Bell (front), National Museum of Singapore
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Balles2601 (talk) on 2024-01-21 20:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Echium bonnetii inflorescence.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-22 05:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Lucius Verus in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-22 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Composition with Japanising Plant Motifs by Alexandre de Riquer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-22 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Francesco Morosini espugna la fortezza di Cisme, Museo Correr in Venice

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-22 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Anous stolidus pileatus (Common noddy) in flight
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-22 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Anous stolidus pileatus (Common noddy) adult with chick
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-22 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Arietites bucklandi, Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-22 13:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Anchor from the RMS Empress of Asia (front), National Museum of Singapore

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-22 13:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (front, south exposure)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-22 15:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Karsha Monastery, Zanskar
Used in:
en:Kursha Monastery • wikidata:Q3320299
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-22 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Keoti Fort, Madhya Pradesh - front and left side
Used in:
en:Keoti Fort • wikidata:Q124251965
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-01-22 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Keoti Fort, Madhya Pradesh - front (east) entrance
Used in:
en:Keoti Fort • wikidata:Q124251965
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-01-22 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal of historical building (1726) Staden 15 in Saarburg, Germany.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-01-22 18:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Lintel (1676) at historical building Pferdemarkt 4 in Saarburg, Germany.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-23 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Naval standard of the Venetian navy with Saint Barbara

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-23 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Composition with winged nymph at sunrise by Alexandre de Riquer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

 Comment Please check category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-23 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Mariegola dell'arte dei Tagiapiera (Mariegola of Stonecutters) - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-01-23 09:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Coat of arms of Abbot Willibrord Scheffer at Hisgenhaus, Schweich, Germany.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2024-01-23 10:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Gandaran Buddha, NUS Museum
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

agouti[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-08-05 09:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Dasyprocta punctata (Central American agouti)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2023-03-24 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Dasyprocta punctata (Central American agouti)
  •  Comment
    We already have a VI in this scope and I see at list one more image of comparable quality, and both are used. Should we start MVR for this scope?
  •  Comment Yes it is better to go through MVR. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Best in Scope now and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Best in Scope now. --Tupungato (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico)

(Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))

Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México

(Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
Reason:
The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
  •  Comment There is already an image promoted in VI: you have to go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"